Ah but do you see the dilemma? If skin A is a pixel for pixel copy of Vista, how can the author then claim skin B is a rip of skin A when skin B could just as easily be another pixel for pixel copy of Vista?
[moderator hat off] Personally, I think they are all rips (including the alleged 'originals') and should be trashed [moderator hat on]
The situation requires further investigation. People, in the mean time, should refrain from leaving comments on skins which they may later regret
I don't think OS skins are rips. I think they probably violate someone's tradedress rights and if a company were to ask us to remove them (and ask the other sites to remove them) then we would. But I don't look at them as rips.
OS skins are one of the most common reasons people skin their PC.
Minor coding glitch....quite selective, really....
Probably reads as "just take the weekend off, Paul....you earned it"....